Digitize well log techlog
![digitize well log techlog digitize well log techlog](https://www.spec2000.net/text103fp/text1019.gif)
Has worked with both geologists and geophysicists in supporting roles. Geoscience Technician - TG707 Geoscience Technician with a bachelor's degree and ten years of experience in data management and seismic data support. Presented peer reviews and post drill presentations. Expertise also includes analyzing Petrophysical and Geochemical data. Skilled in drilling horizontal wells, handling daily rig activities facilitate communication between Drilling & Geology and execute plans. I have done reservoir characterization for various producing formations. I have vast interpretation and drilling experience with Cotton Valley sands. When we talk about how information might change our plans, or change our understanding, we are talking about it's value.Geoscience Technician - TG154 Experienced (21-year) geologist in conducting regional studies, surveillance, field development, operations, exploration, and assets divestitures, focused on business planning, development of conventional and unconventional resource assessment. If your team's strategy is to drill relative time structural highs, then re-doing a velocity model for more accurate depth maps may be a waste of time. If the drilling engineer on your team is on the ball, cost conscious, and able to drill at 40 metres per hour, then LWD (logging-while-drilling) information may not actually allow you to steer the well on the fly. It's nice data to have after the fact, but it won't change how you drill the well. Will adding (or excluding) this ingredient change the taste or outcome of my meal? When deciding whether to run a fancy diagnostic borehole tool, say, or to redo a structure map to include new well data, the wrong thing to ask is "what will this information do for me?", or even, "will this technology or method work?" Instead, we should be asking, "will this change anything?" One way to hone in the appropriate balance is to ask the question, "will this change anything?" On the other end is total information, which can be unwieldy and noisy. On one end of the spectrum is no information, where uncertainty and ambiguity reigns.
![digitize well log techlog digitize well log techlog](http://www.geoafrica.co.za/reddog/rw/logplot_files/image028.jpg)
And that is to say nothing of the reliability of the forecasts!Įvery one of us can pick and choose how much information to use in our daily lives. Stubborn as it is, I often neglect to check the weather forecast before I go out in the morning. I live within walking distance to most things, and I can bear extreme cold for a few minutes (and even run if I have to). So for me, searching for a weather forecast the night before or the first thing won't actually change my morning routine. a scholoarly article, compare to digital data: Here’s how non-digital versions of a document, e.g. Without too much trouble, you could write a script to process batches of these files, adapting to their content and context. There is free, open-source tooling for reading and writing these formats, usually with reference implementations in major languages (e.g. They depend on open formats, some text and some binary, that are widely used. …and can carry more or less arbitrary amounts of metadata. What makes these things truly digital? I think the following things are important: The file contains the CRS (you know you need that, right?) and other things you might need like units, data provenance, attributes, and so on. In these files, objects are described in terms of real geographic parameters, such at latitiude and longitude. So what’s at the top of the digital ladder? In the case of maps, it’s shapefiles or, better yet, GeoJSON.